muflax comments on Rationality Quotes November 2011 - Less Wrong

6 Post author: Jayson_Virissimo 01 November 2011 06:28PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (391)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 01 November 2011 11:25:33PM 6 points [-]

You actually find Lovecraft horrifying? I read a bit (color out of space, a short about ancient lizard people being wiped out by a vengeful god, and a bunch of descriptions) and found it peculiar and sad, but not horrifying. Too much Poe as a baby, I guess.

Comment author: [deleted] 02 November 2011 12:19:48AM 6 points [-]

Lovecraft directly taps into my own madness and fears. He is psychologically quite similar to me and manages to actually express how bad xenophobia and the utter indifference of the cosmos feel. Worst of all, his more madness-focused stories like The Dreams in the Witch-House directly remind me of my own periods of insanity and paranoia. So it's really horrifying through its realism, at least for a certain kind of person.

(And he is the only one I know who does that, though I'm (intentionally) not very familiar with some related authors like Ligotti.)

Plus, violations of the natural order are much worse than anything in traditional horror. A color that doesn't fit in the light spectrum is more terrifying and disgusting to me than serial killers, torture or 2girls1cup. Not sure I can explain that one.

Comment author: kurokikaze 03 November 2011 08:58:34AM 11 points [-]

Pfft. Even magenta doesn't fit in the light spectrum. Are you terrified yet? :)

Comment author: [deleted] 03 November 2011 03:09:28PM *  1 point [-]

Good point. No wonder it has such a negative association.

Comment author: Armok_GoB 02 November 2011 05:21:11PM 2 points [-]

This reminds me of an experiment I've wanted to do for some time, but don't have the necessary equipment for. I'd love to see it tested by someone who do.

*Take multiple light sources each shining in only one frequency, that can be dimmed, in specific triplets. Quickly eyeballing it I'd suggest [420nm, 550nm, 600nm] and [460nm, 500nm, 570nm]. *using a normal white light source as a reference, first adjust the relative intensity of each triplet so the combined light appears white, then scale the combined light (probably by simply altering the distance) to the same intensity. *Both lights should now appear identical. if they don't make further minor adjustments. *Look at them side by side, until you can see the colour out of space. :)

rot13 hint url: UGGC://RA.JVXVCRQVN.BET/JVXV/SVYR:PBAR-ERFCBAFR.FIT

Comment author: saturn 03 November 2011 01:18:11AM 2 points [-]

Why do you want to do this?

Comment author: Armok_GoB 03 November 2011 08:06:41PM 2 points [-]

Because seeing tetracromaticaly would be awesome, even if it's only possible in contrived settings.

Comment author: lavalamp 03 November 2011 08:30:27PM 1 point [-]

Do you expect that setup to feel much different than say, putting florescent and incandescent bulbs next to each other?

I think you need some special equipment to actually see tetrachromatically: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrachromacy#Possibility_of_human_tetrachromats

Comment author: Armok_GoB 03 November 2011 10:14:14PM 1 point [-]

My neurology intuition has proven useful in the past, and I trust it a lot more than that wikipedia article.