That's what lawyers call a "leading question".

This would only be valid if and only if I were not relating an exactly accurate depiction of what was occurring. IF it is leading you to a specific response -- it is a response that is in accordance with what's really happening. This makes it no more "leading" than "would you care to tell the jury why you would be on this particular piece of film stabbing the victim twenty times with a knife, Mr. Defendant?"

I cannot help it that you dislike the necessary conclusions of the current reality; that's a problem for you to handle.

I do not accept your characterisation of the situation. FWIW, I ignore most of what I encounter on the internet - so don't take it too personally.

Then we're done here. You're rejecting reality, and I have no interest in carrying on dialogues with people who refuse to engage in honest dialogue.