davidpearce comments on Biointelligence Explosion - Less Wrong

2 Post author: Dr_Manhattan 07 November 2011 02:05PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (16)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: davidpearce 30 April 2012 12:04:55AM 2 points [-]

Many thanks Dr Manhattan. A scholarly version plus a bibliography ( PDF: http://www.biointelligence-explosion.com/biointelligence-explosion.pdf ) will appear in Springer's forthcoming Singularity volume (cf. http://singularityhypothesis.blogspot.com/p/central-questions.html ) published later this year. Here's a question for lesswrong members. I've been asked to co-author the Introduction. One thing I worry about is that causal readers of the contributors' essays won't appreciate just how radically the Kurzweilian and SIAI conceptions of the Singularity are at odds. Is there anywhere in print or elsewhere where Ray Kurzweil and Eliezer Yudkowski, say, directly engage each other's arguments in debate ? Also, are there any critical but non-obvious points beyond the historical background you think should be included the introductory overview? 

Comment author: JoshuaZ 30 April 2012 12:46:46AM 1 point [-]

It may make sense if you are going to make a point about the different notions of a Singularity to use I. J. Good as the prototype of intelligence explosion Singularity since he's the original proponent. That said, I'm not aware of anywhere where Kurzweil and Eliezer directly engage each other.