r_claypool comments on What visionary project would you fund? - Less Wrong

8 Post author: RichardKennaway 09 November 2011 12:38PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (71)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: r_claypool 10 November 2011 05:45:14AM 2 points [-]

I urge that, with full knowledge of our limitations, we vastly increase our knowledge of the Solar System and then begin to settle other worlds.

These are the missing practical arguments: safeguarding the Earth from otherwise inevitable catastrophic impacts and hedging our bets on the many other threats, known and unknown, to the environment that sustains us. Without these arguments, a compelling case for sending humans to Mars and elsewhere might be lacking. But with them - and the buttressing arguments involving science, education, perspective, and hope - I think a strong case can be made. If our long-term survival is at stake, we have a basic responsibility to our species to venture to other worlds. -- Carl Sagan, Pale Blue Dot

The U.S. space budget is, I think, much too underfunded. European Space Agency is even smaller. I would put the money into space research and send a team to Mars.

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 10 November 2011 10:02:43AM 2 points [-]

I would put the money into space research and send a team to Mars.

Why?

Comment author: billswift 10 November 2011 01:41:40PM *  0 points [-]
Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 10 November 2011 01:43:55PM 0 points [-]

Fair enough.