nyan_sandwich comments on Transhumanism and Gender Relations - Less Wrong

7 [deleted] 11 November 2011 01:48AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (118)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 11 November 2011 07:21:43AM 1 point [-]

yes you are right. I should have made clear I was talking about biological evolution by natural selection. I assume that is also what the OP was talking about, given the reference to selection of mates.

By source code I mean genetic code. Once we have access to that, the human timescale modification will so totally dwarf any natural selection that it's basically not there. Can you elaborate on your position?

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 11 November 2011 08:05:10AM 4 points [-]

By source code I mean genetic code. Once we have access to that, the human timescale modification will so totally dwarf any natural selection that it's basically not there.

Except at that point evolution incorporates human modification into itself. Specifically, those who are better at modifying themselves in way that promote their inclusive genetic fitness will out compete those that don't.

Comment author: wedrifid 11 November 2011 08:19:13AM 3 points [-]

Except at that point evolution incorporates human modification into itself.

Which is, of course, a good point to make up a new name so that the old one isn't stretched out of shape.

Comment author: [deleted] 11 November 2011 01:38:07PM 2 points [-]

I assume that is also what the OP was talking about, given the reference to selection of mates.

Which is obviously affected by memetic evolution.