jimrandomh comments on Why an Intelligence Explosion might be a Low-Priority Global Risk - Less Wrong

3 Post author: XiXiDu 14 November 2011 11:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (94)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jimrandomh 14 November 2011 03:26:03PM 1 point [-]

You won't explain because the explanation is a neighbor of a topic that you were once asked to shut up about, three years ago, because the conversation had gotten repetitive? I think that's being too deferential.

Comment author: wedrifid 14 November 2011 05:40:01PM *  4 points [-]

I think that's being too deferential.

You really interpreted the move as deferential? Or is that you being tactful?

Comment author: timtyler 14 November 2011 03:49:51PM *  1 point [-]

Thanks for that - but for now I'll continue to go with what the site's moderator said.

I am not refusing to explain - the explanation I would offer now is much the same as it was back then. Anyone interested can go and look at the topic that I was forbidden from further discussing.