jimrandomh comments on Why an Intelligence Explosion might be a Low-Priority Global Risk - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (94)
You won't explain because the explanation is a neighbor of a topic that you were once asked to shut up about, three years ago, because the conversation had gotten repetitive? I think that's being too deferential.
You really interpreted the move as deferential? Or is that you being tactful?
Thanks for that - but for now I'll continue to go with what the site's moderator said.
I am not refusing to explain - the explanation I would offer now is much the same as it was back then. Anyone interested can go and look at the topic that I was forbidden from further discussing.