timtyler comments on Why an Intelligence Explosion might be a Low-Priority Global Risk - Less Wrong

3 Post author: XiXiDu 14 November 2011 11:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (94)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jhuffman 14 November 2011 04:36:09PM *  2 points [-]

I can't really accept innovation as random noise. That doesn't seem to account for the incredible growth in the rate of new technology development. I think a lot of developments are in fact based on sophisticated analysis of known physical laws - e.g. a lot of innovation is engineering versus discovery. Many foundational steps do seem to be products of luck; such as the acceptance of the scientific method.

Comment author: timtyler 14 November 2011 04:57:58PM *  1 point [-]

This sounds like Campbell's:

In going beyond what is already known, one cannot but go blindly. If one can go wisely, this indicates already achieved wisdom of some general sort [...] which limits the range of trials.

As I have argued here it is a rather misleading idea.

There may be a random component. As Steven Johnson says: "Chance favours the connected mind".