timtyler comments on Why an Intelligence Explosion might be a Low-Priority Global Risk - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (94)
I can't really accept innovation as random noise. That doesn't seem to account for the incredible growth in the rate of new technology development. I think a lot of developments are in fact based on sophisticated analysis of known physical laws - e.g. a lot of innovation is engineering versus discovery. Many foundational steps do seem to be products of luck; such as the acceptance of the scientific method.
This sounds like Campbell's:
As I have argued here it is a rather misleading idea.
There may be a random component. As Steven Johnson says: "Chance favours the connected mind".