Pavitra comments on Bayes Slays Goodman's Grue - Less Wrong

0 Post author: potato 17 November 2011 10:45AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (120)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Pavitra 17 November 2011 11:48:38PM 2 points [-]

Note that this question was first put forward in 1955, so that it was a purely hypothetical question until 1 January 2000, when sapphires were discovered to be grue. (Before and after images of the same gem.)

The case makes an interesting parallel to the term "black swan", another famous philosophical thought experiment that received unexpected data.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 18 November 2011 02:03:40AM *  0 points [-]

What changed? Are you telling a joke and those are pictures of different gems? Or is one in a different kind of light, or at a different angle? I don't get it.

Edit: Or are you talking about what Alicorn was talking about farther down?

Comment author: Pavitra 18 November 2011 05:15:45AM 1 point [-]

I'm telling a joke.