Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

dlthomas comments on The curse of identity - Less Wrong

125 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 17 November 2011 07:28PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (300)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: dlthomas 17 November 2011 10:40:25PM 0 points [-]

That sounds like it'd work, but at the cost of eliminating most of the fuzzies you'd get from your altruism and most of your donation's social signaling value.

Doesn't that inherently make it a stronger signal when observed?

Comment author: Nornagest 17 November 2011 10:44:00PM *  5 points [-]

Choosing to donate in a self-thankless way might in general, but in this case I think that's dominated by the convenience factor and per-donation triviality. Most people would be probably be less impressed by someone who's donated $50 every month for the last year by some automatic process than by someone who's made a $500 lump donation: the former is higher in absolute terms and makes for a stabler cash flow to the charity, but also carries a fairly strong message of "I don't want to be inconvenienced by my altruism".

Comment author: dlthomas 17 November 2011 10:53:29PM 0 points [-]

Interesting, and quite possible correct.