Normal_Anomaly comments on Funnel plots: the study that didn't bark, or, visualizing regression to the null - Less Wrong

47 Post author: gwern 04 December 2011 11:05AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (40)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 03 December 2011 11:53:42PM 9 points [-]

This is one of the most annoying things about grade school science labs for me. We already know going into the lab what the result should be, and if we get something different we know we need to figure out where we went wrong. The fact is that high school students are never going to get the same accuracy and precision as professional experimenters, but labs should still be conducted before the lesson on the principles involved. Then afterward teachers can ask the students whether they think their numbers are too high, or too low, or whatever.

Comment author: RomeoStevens 05 December 2011 08:27:06AM 3 points [-]

yes, potential sources of error should be thought about and discussed openly BEFORE and AFTER the experiment and only then should the theoretical results be compared.