lavalamp comments on 2011 Survey Results - Less Wrong

94 Post author: Yvain 05 December 2011 10:49AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (513)

Sort By: Leading

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: lavalamp 05 December 2011 08:31:01PM *  10 points [-]

Suggestion: "Which of the following did you change your mind about after reading the sequences? (check all that apply)"

  • [] Religion
  • [] Cryonics
  • [] Politics
  • [] Nothing
  • [] et cetera.

Many other things could be listed here.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 05 December 2011 09:27:55PM 2 points [-]

I'm curious, what would you do with the results of such a question?

For my part, I suspect I would merely stare at them and be unsure what to make of a statistical result that aggregates "No, I already held the belief that the sequences attempted to convince me of" with "No, I held a contrary belief and the sequences failed to convince me otherwise." (That it also aggregates "Yes, I held a contrary belief and the sequences convinced me otherwise." and "Yes, I initially held the belief that the sequences attempted to convince me of, and the sequences convinced me otherwise" is less of a concern, since I expect the latter group to be pretty small.)

Comment author: lavalamp 05 December 2011 10:14:14PM 2 points [-]

Originally I was going to suggest asking, "what were your religious beliefs before reading the sequences?"-- and then I succumbed to the programmer's urge to solve the general problem.

However, I guess measuring how effective the sequences are at causing people to change their mind is something that a LW survey can't do, anyway (you'd need to also ask people who read the sequences but didn't stick around to accurately answer that).

Mainly I was curious how many deconversions the sequences caused or hastened.

Comment author: taryneast 06 December 2011 05:34:09PM 0 points [-]

Ok, so use radio-buttons: "believed before, still believe" "believed before, changed my mind now" "didn't believe before, changed my mind now" "never believed, still don't"

Comment author: TheOtherDave 06 December 2011 07:25:17PM 1 point [-]

...and "believed something before, believe something different now"

Comment author: Alejandro1 05 December 2011 11:03:44PM 1 point [-]

I think the question is too vague as formulated. Does any probability update, no matter how small, count as changing your mind? But if you ask for precise probability changes, then the answers will likely be nonsense because most people (even most LWers, I'd guess) don't keep track of numeric probabilities, just think "oh, this argument makes X a bit more believable" and such.