vi21maobk9vp comments on Beyond the Reach of God, Abridged for Spoken Word - Less Wrong

10 Post author: Raemon 06 December 2011 06:49PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (29)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: vi21maobk9vp 07 December 2011 08:25:26AM 0 points [-]

"This piece is written for those who have something to protect" - shouldn't this be edited not to menion writing?

Comment author: Raemon 07 December 2011 08:39:17AM *  2 points [-]

I removed the word "post." I thought about the altering the word 'written,' but speeches and stories are written just as much as blog posts. "This was written" seemed pretty straightforward for what it is.

The alternative would be:

"But I'm speaking now, for those who have something to protect."

Which I actually kinda like, now that I look at it. Hmm.

Comment author: Grognor 09 December 2011 05:23:42AM 0 points [-]

What's wrong with

"This piece is for those who have something to protect"

?

Comment author: Raemon 09 December 2011 02:45:45PM 0 points [-]

Nothing, actually.

Comment author: tenshiko 09 December 2011 01:31:45AM 0 points [-]

I also really like the sound of that alternative. It's very powerful and personal, and the traditional hemming|hawing about active-not-passive voice actually is a rare case here of genuinely adding emotional voice.

Comment author: Raemon 09 December 2011 01:47:17AM 0 points [-]

What sort of feels wrong to me is that this piece is EXPLICITLY Eliezer talking (whereas Gift We Give Tomorrow are sort of generic people). It feels sort of presumptuous to pretend to be him. Of course, if I'm actually concerned about that then there's more I need to be worried about than this line.