alexflint comments on AIXI and Existential Despair - Less Wrong

13 Post author: paulfchristiano 08 December 2011 08:03PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (37)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: alexflint 09 December 2011 09:36:10AM 1 point [-]

This seems to be the observation that you can't have a Turing machine that implements AIXI. An approximate AIXI is not going to be able to simulate itself.

Yes, I guess you're right. But doesn't this also mean that no computable approximation of AIXI will ever hypothesize a world that contains a model of itself, for if it did then it will go into the infinite loop I described. So it seems the problem of Model 2 will never come up?

The main issue is that before you get to leverage the first N bits of AIXI's output you have to also explain the first N bits of AIXI's input

Not sure I'm understanding you correctly but this seems wrong. AIXI conditions on all its outputs so far, right? So if the world is a bit-repeater then one valid model of the world is literally a bit repeater, which explains the inputs but not the outputs.