DanielLC comments on Issues with the Litany of Gendlin - Less Wrong

16 Post author: Raemon 10 December 2011 05:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (79)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanielLC 11 December 2011 04:16:13AM *  2 points [-]

If I must meddle, I must first understand.

You never must meddle. Perhaps:

It is dangerous to meddle with things I do not understand.
If I wish to meddle, I must first understand.

How do you separate stuff by one line like that?

Edit: lines correctly separated.

Comment author: Raemon 11 December 2011 04:43:55AM 1 point [-]

Put two spaces after your line.
Like this.

I just learned this, like, 2 days ago, and it has changed my world.

Comment author: Raemon 14 December 2011 04:24:19PM *  0 points [-]

I'm going to use this, so now we need to name it.

Obvious option is "Litany of Daniel".

Second option is "Litany of Velma."

(This is going to be in a not so serious section of the evening, and if we use "Litany of Velma" then we can follow it up with the Litany of Joseph: 'Knowing is Half the Battle')

Comment author: DanielLC 15 December 2011 01:44:09AM 1 point [-]

Who is Velma?

Comment author: TimS 15 December 2011 01:57:46AM *  0 points [-]

Scooby-Doo character? She was the most rational of the group.

Editted to add this

Comment author: Raemon 15 December 2011 02:07:23AM 0 points [-]

And since it's probably still unclear, Scooby Doo is relevant because of the oft-mentioned phrase "You meddling kids!"

It's actually NOT the best example of the word "meddling" in this context. "Do not meddle" usually refers to powerful forces that will destroy you if you mess up, whereas Scooby and Co. are just meddling with con-artists, and they usually LEARN stuff by meddling in the first place. But I couldn't think of a better reference offhand. Did a search for "Meddle with forces" and similar things and couldn't find a source that seemed suitably ancient that it would been the original line or anything.