jimrandomh comments on Supporting the underdog is explained by Hanson’s Near/Far distinction - Less Wrong

23 [deleted] 05 April 2009 08:22PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (19)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jimrandomh 05 April 2009 09:42:18PM *  2 points [-]

Why do we think why would we want to signal niceness in the far view? And why should signaling "niceness" involve supporting the underdog?

If you think that the stronger side is morally superior, your decision is trivial, and doesn't signal anything. If one side is stronger while the other is morally superior, then supporting the strong side would be choosing individual best interest over communal best interest, which is like defecting in the prisoner's dilemma.