soreff comments on Prediction is hard, especially of medicine - Less Wrong

47 Post author: gwern 23 December 2011 08:34PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (47)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: soreff 22 December 2011 10:59:46PM 15 points [-]

Ow Ow Ow Ow

Weirdly enough, there is one prediction that looks like it panned out:

Repairing dental defects will also be revolutionized by the introduction of good, tough, and reliable polymers which will replace metallic amalgams. By the late 1990’s to early 2000’s biocompatible ceramics and coated polymers will be available that will allow for workable single tooth and multitooth gum-implanted prostheses.

It would have to be in the single least life-critical area.

A lot of those areas turned out to be intrinsically harder than anyone expected. Oncology, Alzheimer's...

One thing that I just cannot understand: We had semi-workable artificial hearts 30 years ago. Now, yes, it is hard to make surfaces biocompatible. Still, that has been accomplished in many cases. As a society, we are reasonably good at mechanical engineering. How come a quarter of us still lose our live to the failure of a pump? We hear all the time about global warming, and sustainable this and recyclable that, and sometimes about what NASA might do. Prioritizing any of those things ahead of a decent permanent artificial heart is crazy.

Comment author: gwern 22 December 2011 11:27:39PM 5 points [-]

It would have to be in the single least life-critical area.

I thought the increase in cosmetic surgery prediction was also very accurate, even if the US is not yet competitive with (say) South Korea.

Comment author: soreff 23 December 2011 03:34:08AM 1 point [-]

Oops, missed that area, even less life-critical, Many Thanks! (Can I construe the replacement of solid metal crowns with polymers and ceramics as a cosmetic change, and therefore being in an area of overlap? :) )

Comment author: gwern 23 December 2011 05:15:28AM *  4 points [-]

Depends. Weren't solid metal crowns often involved with mercury amalgams? Whenever mercury is involved with anything, I have an unshakeable suspicion that someone is being harmed somewhere. It's a little like lead or a bloody body: maybe it's perfectly innocent and there's a reasonable explanation why you should not be worried by its presence... but don't bet on it and call the police.

Comment author: soreff 23 December 2011 06:56:57PM 0 points [-]

Hmm - as far as I know, the metal crowns that I have didn't require any mercury amalgams.

Comment author: alexflint 24 December 2011 11:35:50PM *  3 points [-]

I have three such ceramic implants. I remember having them put in over a simple half-hour operation, being awed by the amazing advances that medicine had made to allow me to carry on my life as if I hadn't knocked my teeth out at all. Little did I know that this was one of the only success stories of the last decade of medicine!