Comment on Average utilitarianism must be correct?

Tue, 07 Apr 2009 03:17:03 GMT

I bet you're thinking of 101 as "barely more than 10 times as much" of something that faces diminishing returns.

No. I've explained this in several of the other comments. That's why I used the term "utility function", to indicate that diminishing returns are already taken into account.

Discuss