J_Taylor comments on Stupid Questions Open Thread - Less Wrong

42 Post author: Costanza 29 December 2011 11:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (265)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Modig 24 January 2012 01:26:47AM *  0 points [-]

There's an argument that I run into occasionally that I have some difficulty with.

Let's say I tell someone that voting is pointless, because one vote is extremely unlikely to alter the outcome of the election. Then someone might tell me that if everyone thought the way I do, democracy would be impossible.

And they may be right, but since everyone doesn't think the way I do, I don't find it to be a persuasive argument.

Other examples would be littering, abusing community resources, overusing antibiotics, et cetera. They may all be harmful, but if only one additional person does them, the net increased negative effect is likely negligible.

Does this type of argument have a name and where can I learn more about it? Feel free to share your own opinions/reflections on it as well if you think it's relevant!

Comment author: J_Taylor 24 January 2012 01:34:41AM 3 points [-]

Try searching for "free rider problem" or "tragedy of the commons."

Here are the relevant Wiki pages:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_rider_problem

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons

Comment author: Modig 25 January 2012 12:36:12PM 1 point [-]

That's exactly it. I used to know that, can't believe I forgot it. Thanks!