Will_Newsome comments on Rationality quotes January 2012 - Less Wrong

9 Post author: Thomas 01 January 2012 10:28AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (462)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: khafra 03 January 2012 05:00:37AM *  6 points [-]

Is that just a theist version of compatibilist free will? Or an assertion that somehow you could create something without being responsible for its future actions, either by creating the policy that decided them or making them dependent on a source of randomness?

Comment author: Will_Newsome 03 January 2012 07:18:56AM *  6 points [-]

As Jack says, it's the "theist version" of compatibilist free will, but you can replace "God" with "the universe" and the point goes through, Aquinas uses God because he's trying to build up a coherent metaphysics. And quite successfully! He gave the "right answer" to the "free will problem" off-the-cuff as if it was no big deal. This raises my confidence that Aquinas is also insightful when he discusses things I don't yet understand, like faith.

Comment author: Jack 03 January 2012 08:38:44AM 1 point [-]

Aquinas gives all his answers off-the-cuff as if they were no big deal.

As far as early compatibilists go I prefer Chrysippus.