Your comment was hard to read, asserts-but-does-not-argue that days are the "natural" interpretation ("Schelling point"), tells us to "trust the augur" without any real-world or in-universe data showing that augurs are better than horoscopes, contains "I approve of your trolling" and goes against local verities and tastes. Lightning hitting the C is surprising, but there is a simpler explanation for that (see Alejandro1's reply.) There are quite a few reasons not to upvote you.

"100 days to live" is only the sensible, natural interpretation for "lightning struck the C in Caesar" after you've already heard someone suggest it. There's this thing called priming, you see...