wedrifid comments on Rationality quotes January 2012 - Less Wrong

9 Post author: Thomas 01 January 2012 10:28AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (462)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 09 January 2012 12:10:54PM 2 points [-]

You should also try to explain the +17 if you want to win the competition!

There isn't a competition.

ETA: I meant, explain how the +17 is or isn't evidence of lack of sanity, but an explanation of the phenomenon itself would of course be instrumental in attempting such a larger explanation.

No idea one way or the other. I didn't read it. The script in the context didn't pattern match to the kind of thing that would interest me - 17 votes or no. Something about Cs getting struck by lightning.

...

Just read it. It was ok. Somewhat of an insight which I can at least imagine some other people finding interesting. It's a quote and people's standards seem to go out the window when it comes to quotes. I'm only mildly surprised that it got 17.

Comment author: khafra 11 January 2012 02:16:29PM 1 point [-]

people's standards seem to go out the window when it comes to quotes.

Has anyone collected the top-rated comments dealing with math, decision theory, and other technical topics? I'd like to see a site-wide "bikeshedding index" based on the ratio between them and the top-rated quotes.

Comment author: [deleted] 09 January 2012 01:11:53PM 1 point [-]

It was ok.

I agree. I wasn't gunning for Quote of the Month, I just thought this one was good enough to post. We know that gods aren't real, and that augury doesn't work. Fabius has a moment of pseudo-clarity. That's it. I don't understand the point of further nitpicking.

people's standards seem to go out the window when it comes to quotes.

Or halfway decent quotes get more upvotes if they're posted closer to the first of the month.