Tetronian comments on [SEQ RERUN] Something to Protect - Less Wrong

3 Post author: MinibearRex 02 January 2012 04:12AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (12)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 02 January 2012 05:07:32AM 4 points [-]

I agree with the main point here: a potent external source of motivation is an important rationality attractor. This is one of my greatest failings as a rationalist--on most issues I just don't care. (I have a hard time with empathy in general, and I find it really difficult to care about people I can't see.)

Extremely petty nitpick: I don't like the term "something to protect." For whatever reason, the phrase evokes a mental image of rationalization, and when I hear it I always think of someone trying to protect a particular belief from rationality's gaze. Whenever I see a reference to this post, I have to remind myself that "something to protect" means a noble cause that you need rationality for, not an irrational belief.

Comment author: Nornagest 02 January 2012 06:01:22AM *  4 points [-]

"Something to protect" as a phrase, along with the Sequences' construction of heroic effort more generally, made quite a bit more sense to me after I played Fate/stay night.

Comment author: [deleted] 02 January 2012 02:14:27PM 0 points [-]

Same here, but for whatever reason I still have issues with it.