= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Vladimir_Nesov comments on Professional Patients: Fraud that ruins studies - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (13)
This, perhaps facetiously, suggests way more explanatory power than the potential problem in question deserves.
Indeed. I'd heard about this before, so this is not news.
This is what I want to hear more about. Given 5% dupes, how much significance and effect-size does this leech away? My intuition says this could explain a non-zero number of failed drugs, but not the entire dismal litany, but intuition is far inferior to some worked-out numbers.