= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
malthrin comments on [LINK] "We have a new form of knowing." - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (3)
That was interesting, thanks. Here's another take - specific to the field of language modeling, but addresses the same question of statistical versus formal models: http://norvig.com/chomsky.html
Am I wrong for thinking that statistical/classical debate is like a debate about whether a magnifying glass or an electron microscope is preferable for all close seeing? In other words, a fake argument?