Vladimir_Nesov comments on On Comments, Voting, and Karma - Part I - Less Wrong

7 Post author: thomblake 07 April 2009 02:44AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (47)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 09 April 2009 03:13:49PM *  1 point [-]

If posting a certain kind of comments results in expected decrease in karma, people will avoid doing that, so there is an inseparable component of punishment. What you say would only work if there were two separate comment ratings, one for other readers, and one for the writer. Essentially, the hard/soft voting distinction developed to play this role.

Comment author: thomblake 09 April 2009 03:42:02PM 1 point [-]

I suppose that's true if people would really take a decrease in karma as a reason not to post a comment.

If people are doing that, they probably should be punished for it.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 09 April 2009 04:13:07PM 4 points [-]

I'll see about adding the ability to vote down comments that weren't posted for not being posted.

Comment author: thomblake 09 April 2009 05:17:58PM 0 points [-]

My (somewhat limited) knowledge of Python suggests to me that this would not be an easy task; I daresay it might be nearly impossible.

But I agree - we should implement something like that if we can.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 09 April 2009 04:25:32PM 0 points [-]

I suppose that's true if people would really take a decrease in karma as a reason not to post a comment.
If people are doing that, they probably should be punished for it.

You are evil.

Comment author: thomblake 09 April 2009 05:16:30PM 0 points [-]

You are evil.

I have to know - in what sense did you mean this? "not morally good"? "deviously scheming to align the world with my preferences"? "hates paladins"?

For now, I'll just take it as a compliment.