I'm mostly concerned about conventions and broad structure, not content, at this point. I agree entirely with the content you have produced (at least as a rough draft, as you acknowledge). Content can be refined as we go, but I feel it's important to settle questions about overall structure early on.

For any particular topic, I'd like to see two paired articles:

• "topic name" with a short description, references to Wikipedia, standard sources, and a straight list of related OB/LW articles, written in NPOV
• "topic name study guide" with content like what you have done, written in a conversational tone

This might seem like a bikeshed argument, but short names make it easier to search for a topic or link to it from memory. I also like the explicit link between the reference and teaching articles if reasonable pairs exist.

Is there another short description that would work better than "study guide"? I can think of "outline", just "guide", "syllabus", "open questions", "questions".

Does anyone else want to chime in on this? Ciphergoth?