ChrisHibbert comments on What isn't the wiki for? - Less Wrong

8 Post author: ciphergoth 07 April 2009 10:36AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (25)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChrisHibbert 08 April 2009 05:35:59PM 0 points [-]

Somehow, it seems unlikely that "beginners" are going to contribute major new articles on LW. In order to get the right to post, they'll have to join the community and fit in well enough to get upvoted on their comments on other people's posts. Once they've done that, they'll be well on the way to understanding the jargon (even if there are holes in their understanding.) At that point, they'll know what areas are of interest, and if they have a contribution to make in an area we don't often talk about, finding it on a list of things we think are missing is less likely than noticing a lacuna that was invisible to everyone else.

I believe there would be value in a list of Contentious Subjects, but Articles to be Written will be unlikely to cover the new material we're not aware we're waiting for.