NancyLebovitz comments on Suggest alternate names for the "Singularity Institute" - Less Wrong

24 Post author: lukeprog 19 June 2012 04:42AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (152)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 19 June 2012 08:35:09AM *  9 points [-]

The Center for AI Safety-- best of the bunch. It might be clearer as The Center for Safe AI.

The I.J. Good Institute-- I have no idea what the IJ stands for.

Beneficial Architectures Research-- sounds like an effort to encourage better buildings.

A.I. Impacts Research-- reads like a sentence. It might be better as Research on AI Impacts.

Comment author: pjeby 19 June 2012 05:10:04PM 5 points [-]

It might be clearer as The Center for Safe AI

Indeed - it better implies that you're actually working towards safe AI, as opposed to just worrying about whether it's going to be safe, or lobbying for OSHA-like safety regulations.

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 19 June 2012 08:46:02AM *  3 points [-]

The I.J. Good Institute-- I have no idea what the IJ stands for.

Irving John ("Jack").

I would guess that exactly zero of my non-Less Wronger friends have ever heard of I. J. Good.

Comment author: ciphergoth 19 June 2012 09:50:09AM 7 points [-]

I would guess that exactly zero of my non-Less Wronger friends have ever heard of I. J. Good.

Which is fine; to everyone else, it's some guy's name, with moderately positive affect. I'd be less in favour of this scheme if the idea of intelligence explosion had first been proposed by noted statistician I J Bad.

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 19 June 2012 12:38:03PM *  1 point [-]

Now I have Johnny C Bad playing in my head.

(Well, not really, but it made for a fun comment.)

Comment author: ciphergoth 19 June 2012 04:11:06PM 1 point [-]

Better than Johnny D Ugly.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 19 June 2012 03:31:25PM 1 point [-]

The I.J. Good Institute-- I have no idea what the IJ stands for.

Did you not understand that "I.J. Good" is a person's name? (Note that in this thread ciphergoth asserts that everyone recognizes the form as a name, despite your comment which I read as a counterexample.)

Comment author: pjeby 19 June 2012 05:08:25PM 3 points [-]

Did you not understand that "I.J. Good" is a person's name?

Until I read the comment thread, I thought maybe it was facetious and stood for "It's Just Good".

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 19 June 2012 04:11:54PM 3 points [-]

At this point, I'm not sure what I was thinking. It's plausible that knowing what the initials meant would be enough to identify the person.

I'm pretty sure I was thinking "ok, I. J. Good founded a foundation, but who cares?".

Comment author: TheOtherDave 19 June 2012 04:23:25PM 1 point [-]

I can imagine, upon discovering that the "I.J.Good Institute" is interested in developing stably ethical algorithms, deciding that the name was some sort of pun... that it stood for "Invariant Joint Good" or some such thing.