What can I say - that this is the answer one can only wish. Bravo!
The information about this KBBKNN situation I've read around 1987, must have been a little deformed by that magazine. I've took them too seriously.
Now, I am going to investigate another piece I recall and I couldn't find it online until now. This time from the Science magazine sometimes during 1980's. The title I remember was "Never Out of Sorts".
The tables of contents for Science magazine are online. Looking through these might jog your memory. But there are quite a lot of issues.
Recently in another topic I mentioned the "two bishops against two knights" chess endgame problem. I claimed it was investigated over two decades ago by a computer program and established that it is a win situation for the two bishops' side. Then I was unable to Google a solid reference for my claim.
I also remember a "Hermes Set Theory". It was something like ZFC, regarded as a valid Set Theory axiom system for 40 years, until a paradox was found inside. Now, I can't Google it out.
And then it was the so called "Baryon number conservation law", which was postulated for a short while in physics. Until it was found that a subatomic decay may in fact in/decrease the number of baryons in the process. I can't Google that one either.
Is that just me, or what?