= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
HonoreDB comments on A call for solutions and a tease of mine - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (51)
It's not a prediction market, although that was the first idea I remember having when I was trying to work this out.
I do do math.
Hmm, a mathematical framework then. (I doubt something like this would have a good solution that could be concisely expressed in words alone.)
Is it a voting system with some kind of safeguards against double-counting? As in, a single entity voting an infinite number of times for a particular option doesn't shift the outcome toward that option?
But no... you'd only come up with that if you were trying to optimise for anonymity.
I'm reasonably sure it's a mathematical framework, though.
He says ‘answers like “iterated runoff voting,” ... are not in themselves what I'm looking for’, so I think a voting system is not what he's thinking about.