JoachimSchipper comments on Neurological reality of human thought and decision making; implications for rationalism. - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (42)
Dennett argues that human consciousness is essentially a single-threaded program laboriously constructed to run on an essentially parallel machine ("Consciousness explained"; I'm unfortunately still reading.)
We can, I believe, access the underlying machine. Processing social cues (cf. autists), playing Quake or protein folding is too hard for our single-threaded conscious brains, but clearly within human capacity. From personal experience, many high-level mathematicians (professors etc.) also have highly effective intuitions (of course, the ideas still have to be checked by the conscious mind - even highly effective intuitions produce quite a bit of nonsense, and almost always forget some details.)
Not to mention, we can catch baseballs, run, and select targets from a field of distractors, among many other feats of unconscious data processing and system control. This ought not be surprising... while consciousness might (or might not) be single-threaded software running on parallel hardware, there are of course other functions that the hardware performs.