DanielLC comments on Histocracy: Open, Effective Group Decision-Making With Weighted Voting - Less Wrong

14 Post author: HonoreDB 17 January 2012 10:35PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (62)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: DanielLC 18 January 2012 11:36:39PM 3 points [-]

I think you could do better if you look at correlations.

For example, if Alice and Bob always give the same vote, then their combined votes should be exactly the same as if the vote from one of them if only one was on the board.

Another possible improvement: Instead of voting yea or nea, you give a probability. If you give a higher probability, your vote counts more, and it helps you more if you're right, but it hurts you more if you're wrong.