= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
billswift comments on [Meta] No LessWrong Blackout? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (47)
Out of curiosity, how many Congress-critters would have to recant before you would concede 'real benefit'?
I'll concede that it was of help, if they don't try to pass one of them, or an equivalent bill, next year after the elections. As I put it in a different HN comment thread:
For now, any way. As soon as it's out of the news, after the elections, they will almost certainly try to pass them, or another similar bill, again. It's a never ending game of Whack-A-Mole. Eventually, one will get through.
ADDED: This is a combination focussed benefit for SOPA/PIPA/RWA supporters, versus a collective action problem for the opposition. While I hate the SOPA/PIPA/RWA trilogy, the reality is they will very probably (>80%) become law within the next three years.
For those unfamiliar with the RWA, here's Derek Lowe's discussion, Down with the Research Works Act.
"The price of freedom is eternal vigilance."
It would be wonderful if defending freedom were a one-off job like proving Fermat's Last Theorem. As it turns out, it's an endlessly recurring job like fighting disease; unfortunate, but that's the way it is. And yes, sometimes our efforts fail, and freedoms are lost or people get sick and die. But the answer to that is to work harder and smarter, not to give up.
Until you eradicate smallpox, or polio, or Congress.