pjeby comments on How I Ended Up Non-Ambitious - Less Wrong

113 Post author: Swimmer963 23 January 2012 11:50PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (237)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 24 January 2012 03:38:59AM 13 points [-]

Ya know, it's people like you what cause people to spend their lives silent and paralyzed by indecision for fear of making a single social error that they will never be allowed to correct.

Comment author: pjeby 24 January 2012 04:49:44AM 18 points [-]

Ya know, it's people like you what cause people to spend their lives silent and paralyzed by indecision for fear of making a single social error that they will never be allowed to correct.

You did notice that you're doing the exact same thing sie is doing, right? (That is, jumping to a conclusion about what kind of person someone is, based on a single action.)

Comment author: wedrifid 24 January 2012 06:12:17AM 3 points [-]

You did notice that you're doing the exact same thing sie is doing, right?

Out of interest is "sie" one of those gender neutral terms that have been invented or a typo?

Comment author: pjeby 24 January 2012 09:34:56PM 1 point [-]

Gender neutral. "Mitchell Porter" sounds male, but for some reason my brain pings back that I've heard of a female with that exact first and last name, and the probability it could be that Mitchell Porter seems high.

Comment author: komponisto 26 January 2012 06:25:16PM 7 points [-]

Out of interest is "sie" one of those gender neutral terms that have been invented or a typo?

Gender neutral.

Bad choice; it's German for "she".

Comment author: Vladimir_Golovin 24 January 2012 06:57:20PM 0 points [-]

The 'i' key is not adjacent to 's', 'h' or 'e', so I guess it's intentional.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 24 January 2012 07:37:25PM 2 points [-]

No, that would be saying, "I will never again reply to any thread in which you have participated" or something like that. The important thing is to be allowed to say "Oops".

Comment author: pjeby 24 January 2012 09:46:24PM 11 points [-]

I didn't say that you were doing the same thing you were accusing hir of doing; I said you were both jumping to conclusions about character on the basis of single actions. And hir objection, while a significant over-reaction, didn't go so far as to directly reduce you to a mere class of person.

If you'd said that throwing tantrums like that caused people to spend their lives silent and paralyzed, that'd get the same point across without stooping to the actual personal attack of "people like you".

(Certainly, some people might still take it as a personal attack without that phrase, but you'd be less likely to have your existing allies take up their side, interpreting you as needlessly kicking an underdog.)