Sly comments on AI Box Role Plays - Less Wrong

5 Post author: lessdazed 22 January 2012 07:11PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (49)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Sly 26 January 2012 06:07:12PM 0 points [-]

How would it do that inside the box? You are vastly overestimating it's abilities by orders of magnitude.

No wonder we have such differing opinions.

Comment author: MileyCyrus 26 January 2012 11:14:53PM 0 points [-]

Read the rules, particularly the parts about cancer cures.

Comment author: Sly 26 January 2012 11:32:50PM 2 points [-]

Reading those rules I see that:

The Gatekeeper party may resist the AI party's arguments by any means chosen - logic, illogic, simple refusal to be convinced, even dropping out of character - as long as the Gatekeeper party does not actually stop talking to the AI party before the minimum time expires.

So yeah.

Comment author: MileyCyrus 26 January 2012 11:49:49PM *  0 points [-]

You asked how the AI would be able to provide next week's lottery numbers. This section of the rules has nothing to do with that.

I have given you more than enough chances to demonstrate that you care about playing as an actual gatekeeper would. I have another offer from someone who will be a better sport.

Comment author: Sly 27 January 2012 03:09:09AM 1 point [-]

It is unfortunate that you think a winning strategy is not being a good sport, when it is specifically OKed in the passage I quoted.

I will play exactly as I would were I an actual gatekeeper. If I were a real gatekeeper, I would win.

Comment author: MileyCyrus 27 January 2012 03:59:31AM 0 points [-]

I have no doubt that you would "win", if by "win" you mean "keep the box closed".