Simple, good observation.
I wondered exactly what "The Convenience Principle" is. The article doesn't define it, but the examples seem to say: when some process/tool sometimes helps, especially in making something feasible that wasn't before, people will think of only the use and not the harms. Surface level, fast thinking. Liking. Probably this applies more in defense of things people are used to than to entirely novel things.
I think the essential problem with convenience is this: -- If you make X more convenient, you expect to have the same amount of X for smaller costs. What often happens is that when X becomes cheaper, people will use much more of X. At the end of day, your costs of one X have decreased, but your costs of total X may have increased.
For example it is more convenient to send an e-mail, than to write a postcard or a paper letter. Problem is, people will start to send many trivial e-mails with jokes etc. After a few decades many people spend more time maintainin...
Distraction is a Symptom of a Deeper Problem: The Convenience Principle and the Destruction of American Productivity is a good article on distractions versus getting things done. With extra emphasis on how many of our distractions are the result of a desire for convenience rather than something more substantial.