= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Jandila comments on The Human's Hidden Utility Function (Maybe) - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (87)
Or, to put it more simply:
Is 2 operant/Skinnerian conditioning, and 3 classical/Pavolvian conditioning?
If by "is" you mean "Do these correspond the underlying cognitive antecedents used in...", then my answer is "it would seem so."
Maybe give Luke a lesson or two on C^3 (clear, concise and catchy) summaries.
Note that I wrote this post in two hours flat and made little attempt to optimize presentation in this case.
For my own reference, here are the posts I tried to write well:
It might be an interesting exercise to record predictions in a hidden-but-reliable form about karma of posts six months out, by way of calibrating one's sense of how well-received those posts will be to their target community.
It's still better than the posts I write in 2 hours! Did that 2 hours include the time spent researching, or were you just citing sources you'd already read for other reasons? In either case...not bad.
Sorry, I did not intend my comment to rub you the wrong way (or any of my previous comments that might have). FWIW, I think that you are doing a lot of good stuff for the SIAI, probably most of it invisible to an ordinary forum regular. I realize that you cannot afford spending extra two hours per post on polishing the message. Hopefully one of the many skills of your soon-to-be-hired executive assistant will be that of "optimizing presentation".
Indeed. Much invisible work is required before optimization can occur. Invisible forging of skills precedes their demonstration.
No worries!
Added to the original post, credit given.
Could you put it before the hard-to-parse explanations? It was nice to confirm my understanding, but it would have saved me a minute or two of effort if you'd put those first.