Eugine_Nier comments on Sunk Costs Fallacy Fallacy - Less Wrong

25 [deleted] 24 January 2012 09:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (28)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 24 January 2012 10:05:52PM *  8 points [-]

Some things that might de-skew my evaluation of exciting new projects:

  • If the project is new, it probably looks shinier than it is. I should wait a while or try to correct for this before evaluating.
  • I should take into account my record of defecting halfway thru a project to discount the utility of the new project.

If you assume that your future self will make a rational decision about whether to defect, this is unnecessary.

  • The latter half of a project is relatively untouched territory, full of valuable new experiences. I will have to work thru the first half of the new project to get to this, but I am already at the threshold on the current project.
  • Maybe there's more?

Yes, remember the cost of getting the new project up to the point where the current project is right now. The sunk cost fallacy says you should ignore the "sunk cost" of work on the project you've completed so far; however, you should not ignore the "replacement cost" of that work.

Comment author: [deleted] 24 January 2012 10:41:09PM 2 points [-]

If you assume that your future self will make a rational decision about whether to defect, this is unnecessary.

I'm unsure of this. If I missed some other source of irrationality, and didn't include this empirical catch-all, I can imagine still making the stupid decision.

replacement cost

Thanks for the terminology.