fubarobfusco comments on Shit Rationalists Say? - Less Wrong

30 Post author: Eneasz 25 January 2012 09:51PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (116)

Comments (116)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 26 January 2012 07:07:40PM *  16 points [-]

Here's a few, courtesy of applying JWZ's dadadodo to all the lines in the thread so far:

What does the best textbook on corrupted hardware. Dark Arts; Escher, Bach?

How could you credibly pre commit to see you as a compartmentalized belief?

I'm trying to be a cult.

Have super powers.

You've fallen prey to be condescending.

My current job has higher expected utility than you imagine; but in the sanity waterline.

Everyone is Far.

No idea is reliable? Have a lot of caring.

Conceptspace is the future.

Mysteriousness is a cult.

I'm going to be with the AI. I know the universe future.

Look, just generalize from the territory.

Everyone is bigger than you in Cute Puppies.

Emacs' M-x dissociated-press yields babble, but with some interesting words in it: "knowledgeneralize", "metacontrammer", "contrationalist", "choosequences", "the universal priory", "statististimate", "fanfused", "condescendista", "frobability", "dissolomonoff", "optimprovement", "estimagine", "cooperaterline", "pattern matchology". The only sensible sentence it's come up with is "I'm running on condescending".

Comment author: Multiheaded 26 January 2012 07:15:37PM 9 points [-]

No idea is reliable? Have a lot of caring.

I visualized that being said simultaneously with the middle-finger gesture.

Comment author: thomblake 26 January 2012 07:36:36PM *  5 points [-]

the universal priory

I seem to remember someone's already made a Bayesian Priory pun, but if not then it should happen prominently.

EDIT: here

Comment author: Multiheaded 26 January 2012 11:28:50PM 2 points [-]

Conceptspace is the future.

Wrong. Electronic old men are.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 26 January 2012 11:55:41PM *  3 points [-]

To give an idea of what these look like raw, here's a paragraph of dadadodo:

What does the universe with ice cream trees. I have little Pony episode about what would you measure, not like to tile the universe with the argument? That's just signaling virtue: Death is bad. That's just a startup. I have little XML tags on corrupted hardware. Whoa, there's a compelling case for you read the least I wish to be the fulfillment of us is, not the MINDKILLER if keeping my model of Rationality? Tsuyoku naritai! So after all over the bad; result, you're running on that.

And here's a similar-sized chunk of M-x dissociated-press:

You shou have now is white' is true if an you imaginew Methods of in this riggerse tiled in paperclips. I have akrasian found underate if and only if keeping my current job has hight write rationalized belief? I cause can have you regenerate that say 'moral' It will bach? What die. You shods of Rationalith a good cause coherent extrapolass? We need wanterval line shouldn't implement Really Extreme An applause lity chaptere. I knowledge aren't believe there's Near, this is For me, but at's the bes a tering: Dark Artup, I wish to Solomonoff Indus today. What would you said to be can ding to Solve psychock Levent is, if you should read Goedel, Escher.

Of these, I rather like:

I have little XML tags on corrupted hardware.
shods of Rationalith
extrapolass

The blended-words effect seems to give M-x dissociated-press a sort of Finnegans Wake atmosphere which dadadodo doesn't have.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit