DanielLC comments on HPMOR: What could've been done better? - Less Wrong

5 Post author: Anubhav 28 January 2012 01:31PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (109)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: DanielLC 28 January 2012 06:35:25PM 8 points [-]

There's a TVTropes discussion on this: Harry Potter Headscratchers

I might as well repeat the ones I put on there.

Shouldn't it be Harry Potter-Evans-Verres and the Methods of Rationality?

Why is Harry so death averse? He claims to be a preference utilitarian, but the sorting hat had no desire to live, yet Harry didn't want it to die.

Why does Harry reject the idea of Horcruxes? You can't save more than half the population, so it's hardly a permanent solution, but you could kill half of the people right before they die, and save the other half. This would work as a hold-over until Harry becomes God. Given my understanding of canon, this wouldn't actually work, but Harry wouldn't have no that yet.

In what way can a crime that hinges on an eleven-year-old boy be considered "the perfect crime"?

According to Wikipedia, timeless physics was discovered in 1999. If this takes place in 1991-1992, how does Harry know about it? Did he work it out himself?

Comment author: kilobug 29 January 2012 10:12:30AM 5 points [-]

To me the main reason of Harry rejecting Horcruxes is the "anti-Dark Lord Harry program". Harry is trying hard (and with relative success) to prevent becoming a Dark Lord, and rejecting a way to reach immortality for some at the expense of killing others is a way to refuse the Dark Lord path. Harry (in my view) doesn't fully trust himself to wield raw consequentialism, and he respects ethical injunctions like "murder is just wrong" (at least when he's just a 11yo boy and still afraid of becoming a Dark Lord).

Comment author: DanielLC 29 January 2012 08:15:39PM 1 point [-]

But Harry wasn't afraid of being a Dark Lord until the end of being sorted.

Comment author: Anubhav 29 January 2012 07:36:48AM 4 points [-]

Everything on that list (except for the timeless physics) has been answered on the Headscratchers thread itself.

As for timeless Physics, that's just Eliezer making use of artistic licence.

Warning: Don't wander. One of the things you can find on the sidebar has spoilers for upcoming chapters.

Comment author: magfrump 29 January 2012 06:03:07AM 4 points [-]

I always thought Harry rejected the idea of mass horcruxing because he was talking to Dumbledore and didn't want to look evil, and that (conditional on better methods not coming around and continued trust in Quirrel) he would have discussed this later with Quirrel.