RichardKennaway comments on The utility of information should almost never be negative - Less Wrong

5 Post author: Solvent 29 January 2012 05:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (23)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 30 January 2012 01:51:36PM 1 point [-]

I prove this as a mathematical theorem here:

Theorem. Every act of observation has, before you make it, a non-negative expected utility.

Note that the theorem ignores everything that you might expect it to ignore from the formulation: non-rational or non-utility-maximising agents, the cost of acquiring and using the information, the effects of other people knowing you know it, the effects on yourself of knowing you know it (as distinct from merely knowing it and so updating your utility-maximising decisions), etc. etc.

Should I write this up for arXiv? The theorem is not deep, but neither is Aumann's agreement theorem, and that's in a journal.