Nick_Tarleton comments on The uniquely awful example of theism - Less Wrong

36 Post author: gjm 10 April 2009 12:30AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (169)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Nick_Tarleton 10 April 2009 07:59:40PM *  2 points [-]

Regarding the good Reverend, we stand on the shoulders of giants that came after him, and are lucky enough to find ourselves in a more tolerant environment. And Laplace independently went further than Bayes not that much later, and had no need of that hypothesis.

Yes, I'm being snide, but this sounds a bit too self-congratulating. Are we really in a position to be all but saying "these specific beliefs are a prerequisite for posting"?

Did komponisto say that? I read "expect" as descriptive, not normative.

Comment author: SoullessAutomaton 10 April 2009 08:16:48PM 0 points [-]

The bit about Rev. Bayes was something of a cheap shot, I admit. My impression has actually been that Bayes himself was a mostly unremarkable scholar (compared to someone like Laplace, that is!) and quite possibly would not even agree with modern Bayesian statistics.

Did komponisto say that? I read "expect" as descriptive, not normative.

I read it as a bit of both. If I was incorrect to do so, mea culpa and apologies to komponisto.