Z_M_Davis comments on "Stuck In The Middle With Bruce" - Less Wrong

54 Post author: CronoDAS 09 April 2009 12:24AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (93)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: thomblake 09 April 2009 01:06:50PM 4 points [-]

its been carefully designed to continually suck more money out of your pocket.

The game was actually designed without the 'collectable' element, which emerged naturally from the design process since everybody always wanted access to more/newer cards as they played. See any of the various histories regarding Richard Garfield's original concept and playtesting.

Arguably, the focus on sucking money out of your pocket came about the time the cards began to develop aftermarket values, it became widely popular, and events like sanctioned tournaments and the 'pro tour' began ('94-'96)

Comment author: swestrup 09 April 2009 07:35:51PM 0 points [-]

I find it 'interesting' that we've both had our posts voted down to zero. Could it be that someone objects to pointing out that the game is a money sink and therefore one might have perfectly rational reasons to avoid it?

Comment author: Z_M_Davis 09 April 2009 07:54:17PM 2 points [-]

Posts now start at zero, with self-voting no longer allowed.

Comment author: swestrup 10 April 2009 02:29:04AM 0 points [-]

Ah, interesting. That was not considered important enough to get into the RSS feed, so I never saw it.