GabrielDuquette comments on Rationality Quotes February 2012 - Less Wrong

5 [deleted] 01 February 2012 09:03PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (401)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 01 February 2012 02:18:49PM *  27 points [-]

It is the most common way of trying to cope with novelty: by means of metaphors and analogies we try to link the new to the old, the novel to the familiar. Under sufficiently slow and gradual change, it works reasonably well; in the case of a sharp discontinuity, however, the method breaks down: though we may glorify it with the name 'common sense', our past experience is no longer relevant, the analogies become too shallow, and the metaphors become more misleading than illuminating.

E. W. Dijkstra

Comment author: CronoDAS 05 February 2012 03:31:29AM 5 points [-]
Comment author: cousin_it 02 February 2012 02:31:14PM *  2 points [-]

That's certainly a mistake that many people make, but we shouldn't consciously correct for it unless it's a bias with predictable direction. Does excessive belief in common-sense analogies really cause more problems than excessive belief in new shiny ideas? How do you tell?

Comment author: [deleted] 02 February 2012 02:41:22PM 6 points [-]

I don't think the quote is about favoring common sense over new shiny ideas. I think it's about how we tend to be lazy with words as long as we can get away with it -- until the words are completely wrong.

Dijkstra doesn't propose that novelty is avoidable. He admonishes us for describing it poorly.