army1987 comments on Hearsay, Double Hearsay, and Bayesian Updates - Less Wrong

47 Post author: Mass_Driver 16 February 2012 10:31PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (105)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 16 February 2012 10:21:47AM *  1 point [-]

IAWYC, but

Literally 100%

Seriously? How many crimes has someone dying at the age of 1 committed in average?

Comment author: ArisKatsaris 16 February 2012 10:39:33AM *  9 points [-]

How many crimes has someone dying at the age of 1 committed in average?

Being a public nuisance.
Destruction of their parents' property.
Kicking their mom can probably be classified as domestic violence.

Edited to add: Also biting.

Comment author: TimS 16 February 2012 02:04:46PM 6 points [-]

A but of hyperbole, perhaps. Nonetheless, it is all but certain that the overwhelming majority of Americans (100% - epsilon would not surprise me) over the age of responsibility (~7 years old) have committed a felony.

Comment author: skepsci 16 February 2012 10:36:16AM 2 points [-]

An unfriendly legal system might treat being born as a crime. In fact, I'd be surprised if some politician in Arizona hasn't tried to make being born to illegal immigrant parents a crime.

Comment author: David_Gerard 17 February 2012 08:56:06AM *  2 points [-]

The downvotes surprise me, because the rhetoric is precisely along these lines, e.g. Sonny Bono wanting to remove state benefits from the US-born children of illegal immigrants on the justification "they're illegal". Illegal people.

Comment author: skepsci 17 February 2012 12:30:26PM 0 points [-]

Yeah, I was wondering about the downvotes. The welcome thread says that it's perfectly acceptable to ask for an explanation... So, for anyone who downvoted me, why?

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 17 February 2012 01:48:20PM 0 points [-]

Didn't downvote, but I think your comment visually matches the 'strawman argument' pattern. Except that it is not.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 17 February 2012 09:31:27PM 1 point [-]

Except that it is not.

[citation please]

Comment author: thomblake 16 February 2012 03:33:30PM 0 points [-]

It seems to me that even children that young have generally done various sorts of property damage and assault, and that most excuses for that behavior will rest on not considering them "people".

Comment author: MixedNuts 16 February 2012 04:37:22PM 8 points [-]

An adult with the behavior of a very young child would be declared irresponsible by psychiatrists, and thus couldn't be tried (but could be arrested and committed). It seems reasonable to apply this to children, and they are automatically committed to restrictive institutions already.

Comment author: taw 16 February 2012 10:33:47AM 0 points [-]

A 1 year old not many yet, but in US police has been increasingly used even against elementary school children, so 1 year olds are not safe forever.