= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
MileyCyrus comments on Hearsay, Double Hearsay, and Bayesian Updates - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (105)
taw was only reporting to one significant digit :P
I see three.
Still, I'd bet that at least 99.5% of people alive now have done something which is technically illegal in their jurisdiction. (Not sure about “who ever lived”, though.)
100.% (with a decimal before the percent sign) would be three. 100% with no decimal is one.
I'd consider numbers such as “100” to be ambiguous between one, two or three significant digits. As for “literally”...