Eliezer_Yudkowsky comments on Quantified Health Prize results announced - Less Wrong

44 Post author: Zvi 19 February 2012 08:10AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (63)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Zvi 19 February 2012 02:48:57PM 8 points [-]

A lot of people were very put off by the state of knowledge in this area; it turned out we'd chosen an area where it's very difficult to do good work. Kevin's entry illustrates this more than anything - he started out thinking he knew things about how to supplement, and then decided he knew far less than he thought.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 20 February 2012 10:16:49PM 6 points [-]

This confirms a prediction that I'm pretty sure I went around saying in advance (the state of knowledge in nutrition is fucked up beyond most easy epistemic wins).

Comment author: MichaelVassar 21 February 2012 06:46:35PM 6 points [-]

Wow I'd call that confirmation bias. We got some significant solidification of existing info, a bit of new info, and spent $7500. Multiply these results by 1000 and what do you get? I'd guess, a fairly thorough knowledge-base.