CarlShulman comments on Using degrees of freedom to change the past for fun and profit - Less Wrong

41 Post author: CarlShulman 07 March 2012 02:51AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (23)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CarlShulman 07 March 2012 04:58:00PM 3 points [-]

We, the readers, can take both the parachute paper and the Bem paper as highlighting flaws and limitations of standard methods (in psychology and evidence-based medicine) by using them to derive bogus conclusions (don't use parachutes, and precognition is real). Likewise with the "False Positive Psychology" paper at the top.

Comment author: Gabriel 07 March 2012 06:47:34PM *  1 point [-]

But saying that Bem's paper wasn't about parapsychology suggests that he intended it as a warning against flawed methods just like the parachute people did. That looks like defending people who do bad science by saying "it was all a joke, really!"