hamnox comments on Get Curious - Less Wrong

51 Post author: lukeprog 24 February 2012 05:10AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (98)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: rhollerith_dot_com 23 February 2012 07:39:24PM *  3 points [-]

have a jar of mini chocolate chips by your desk and pop one in your mouth every time you google an interesting question on scholar or wikipedia.

Disagree. The target of your advice has reported serious health problems (and his akrasia would probably be a lot easier to overcome if it weren't for the health problems, according to my models (which are based only on what he has posted to LW and on information not specific to him)) so I would advise him not to choose what to eat for its reward value.

To help him decide what weight to give my advice, I will add that I have had serious health problems for the last 40 years.

Moreover, I have serious doubts about the usefulness of setting up blatantly artificial (i.e., self-imposed for the purpose of conditioning oneself) cause-and_effect relationships between desired changes in behavior and rewards even when the rewards have no expected negative effect on health.

Comment author: hamnox 24 February 2012 09:37:46PM 3 points [-]

You're right. This was very poorly considered advice. I'm ashamed to admit I kind of recognized that as I was writing it, but posted it anyways for reasonable-sounding justifications that now suspiciously elude memory.

Comment author: rhollerith_dot_com 26 February 2012 03:34:13AM *  0 points [-]

I kind of recognized that as I was writing it, but posted it anyways

I know the feeling (from times I have given advice).