ialdabaoth comments on Akrasia and Shangri-La - Less Wrong

38 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 10 April 2009 08:53PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (94)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: pjeby 11 April 2009 02:07:34AM 12 points [-]

false but appealing bullshit that plays hell with the bodies and feelings of every poor fat person who tries to live that lie

This is precisely how I feel about most self-help and productivity advice, except substituting "mind" for "bodies", and "procrastinator" for "fat person". ;-)

Comment author: ialdabaoth 16 February 2013 07:51:40PM 2 points [-]

This is precisely how I feel about most self-help and productivity advice, except substituting "mind" for "bodies", and "procrastinator" for "fat person". ;-)

The fact that it feels precisely identical should not be surprising at all - precisely the same mechanism is occurring in both cases.

Mental health/productivity and physical health/fitness are both situations that have a massive social stigma, and a massive incentive for people who are (to use Msr. Yudkowski's term) "privileged" to function in a manner that allows them to achieve socially acceptable results by performing socially acceptable procedures.

The fact is, our culture (and regrettably, ESPECIALLY the sort of people who are attracted to lesswrong) thrives on the sort of "but I'm better than that!" thinking that leads directly to prejudiced bullshit about "willpower" and "not trying hard enough" and "wanting to fail" and "ugly fat fucks" and "useless social retards" and "parasite welfare queens". Because, as a species of social primate thrust into a constant high-stress environment, those of you who are constantly receiving cortisol/dopamine signals that you're just-barely-making-it-but-look-out-for-that-tiger need people to feel superior to.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 13 September 2013 10:41:54AM 2 points [-]

I find that LW has much less of the prejudiced bullshit you describe than mainstream culture, probably because of the common belief that willpower isn't magic.

Comment author: ialdabaoth 13 September 2013 11:58:24PM 1 point [-]

Interesting. I would very much like to also find that LW has much less of that prejudiced bullshit. Can you think of a way that our behaviors might lead to our differences in experience, so that I might experience more of the LW that you are experiencing?

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 14 September 2013 08:44:38AM 2 points [-]

I suspect that I've got some tendency towards "glass half full"-- I tend to notice the good stuff.

Also, LW being better on the issue than the mainstream doesn't mean that LW is consistently good, just that it isn't resoundingly awful.

This update from CFAR is a good example on LW of supporting skillful means rather than just blaming people who aren't doing well.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 14 September 2013 03:06:58AM 0 points [-]

willpower isn't magic.

True on the other hand, social pressure is a great way to fight akrasia. On the other hand telling people they have no control over their actions is a great way to promote akrasia.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 14 September 2013 08:46:34AM 1 point [-]

Social pressure works to oppose akrasia.... except when it doesn't work. Some people end up crushed rather than pushed in a useful direction.

Comment author: [deleted] 14 September 2013 05:02:18PM 0 points [-]
Comment author: TheOtherDave 16 February 2013 11:21:09PM 1 point [-]

those of you who are constantly receiving cortisol/dopamine signals that you're just-barely-making-it-but-look-out-for-that-tiger

Do you use the second person with the intention of not including yourself in that group?
If so, I'm interested in what you believe distinguishes your group from the group you're addressing.

Comment author: ialdabaoth 17 February 2013 01:20:11AM 0 points [-]

Do you use the second person with the intention of not including yourself in that group? If so, I'm interested in what you believe distinguishes your group from the group you're addressing.

I'm a useless social retard, and thus am no longer receiving signals that I'm just-barely-making-it. I am instead receiving I'm-fucked-and-need-to-self-terminate-for-the-sake-of-the-pack signals.

Comment author: DSherron 02 May 2013 04:17:52AM 2 points [-]

I'm a useless social retard, and thus am no longer receiving signals that I'm just-barely-making-it. I am instead receiving I'm-fucked-and-need-to-self-terminate-for-the-sake-of-the-pack signals.

Um, no you're not? This is the theory of Group Selectionism. There is no chemical signal that your brain will naturally produce corresponding to "suicide for the good of the pack". You can arrive at that idea through other means, but there is almost certainly no low-level chemical signal which corresponds to suicide for the good of the group; everyone who might've passed that gene on to you died out for the sake of the people that didn't have it.

Comment author: waveman 28 March 2014 12:41:09PM 0 points [-]

If the pack contains blood relatives, yes it can. See Kin Selection.